Essays Written On The Necklace

This is an example essay on character analysis of “The Necklace”:
Guy de Maupassant’ narrative of “The Necklace” is chilly and has a cruel irony effect. The suffering set forth in the story seems to have been needless, due to the fact of misunderstanding and petty pride in Mr. and Mrs. Loisel. The craftsmanship of the story had been masterfully manipulated to where the revelation was held until the very end of the story.

Characters in a story can be classified as “dynamic” or “static”. Dynamic characters are characters that change as the story progresses. That is, they recognize, change with, or adjust to circumstances. Static characters, which can also be described as “flat”, are characters that are not well developed and remain fairly unchanged throughout the story. Usually static characters have minor roles in a story (e.g. co-workers, friends, policeman, etc.).

Mathilde Loisel, the main character in “The Necklace” seems to be a very dynamic character, although some of her moods appear to stay with her longer than others. Many of the things she had imagined often were not considered by other women of her social rank, such as worn-out chairs, curtains, and boiled beef for dinner, tortured and filled her with despair. (3) Feeling as though she had once deserved to marry better, but was unable to obtain a well to do husband she settled for a marriage with a minor clerk in the Ministry of Education. She is described as to have suffered ceaselessly, according to her daily description of her lifestyle. She would often ease her suffering of being in a drab house by visiting with her rich friend, Mrs. Forrestier. Mrs. Loisel had often dwelt upon her fantasies of a more elaborate life. Her desire to be of a higher status and to possess nice valuable trinkets seemed to poison her very nature.

Mr. Loisel notice that his wife is not satisfied with her lifestyle. Seeing how she daydreams of living in luxury they cannot afford. He becomes excited as he carries an invitation to go too a formal dinner with the Ministry of Education. He had worked hard to get recognized for his efforts. Not too many clerks were invited to such an occasion. (6) Mrs. Loisel becomes upset because she has nothing elegant to wear for such an occasion. By forcing a few tears and sadly confronting her husband about her misfortunate state, she is able to convince him that she needs an expensive dress for a once in a lifetime event. Mrs. Loisel tells her husband she will need about 400 francs to purchase a dress worthy enough to get the attention of the other people at the dinner. The price was slightly more the he expected but gave her the money to purchase it from his next summer’s vacation fund. Continuing with the emotion of self-pity, she develops into a greedy individual. The dress is not enough on its own, she will need an elaborate necklace to draw attention to herself. Mathilde is able to obtain a rather lovely necklace from Mrs. Forrestier who has large amount jewelry.

The night of the party, Mrs. Loisel was prettier than anyone else, stylish, graceful, smiling, and wild with joy. (53) She enjoys the immense amount of attention she is receiving. Mrs. Loisel is so caught up in her own self-centeredness that she totally forgets about her husband. She cares for nothing, but the moment she is in. The party ends in the early morning hours and Mrs. Loisel wants to leave in a hurry. She wants the people she met at the party to remember her as was. She conceals her true identity because she is embarrassed for who she really is.

In the midst of a returning home after a grand evening she notices she has lost a costly possession…the necklace!! Mr. and Mrs. Loisel look through her dress, shawl, pockets, and retraced all their steps from the party. (65) They worried and fretted about the lost necklace offering a reward for its return.

They realize the inevitable situation they are in and have to replace the necklace. They went from jeweler to jeweler, searching for an indistinguishable replacement. (90) The replacement would cost 36,000 francs. Mr. Loisel had 18,000 francs left to him by his father. The other half would take three days to acquire from various loan companies and friends. Mrs. Loisel returns the necklace and does not tell Mrs. Forrestier that it’s not the same one that she borrowed.

Mrs. Loisel now has to work, along with her husband working late hours. She takes a job as a servant, cleaning house, washing dishes, and other heavy housework. (99) She rents out a servant’s quarter and learns what its like to be among the working class. During this time she becomes somewhat practical. Now she has experienced what is really like to be the wife of a clerk. The debt would take 10 years to pay back.

After the 10 years she finds Mrs. Forrestier walking with her child. She notices that she is youthful and attractive. Mrs. Forrestier hardly recognizes her and regards her as a lowly working class woman. (110) She tells Mrs. Forrestier that she has just finished paying off the necklace that she had borrowed for the dinner. Sadly, in the end after all she has put herself and her husband through, she finds out that it was really in vain. Mrs. Forrestier tells her if she had only told her years ago, she would have only paid about five hundred francs because it was only costume jewelry.

______________ is a professional essay writing service which can provide high school, college and university students with 100% original custom written essays, research papers, term papers, dissertations, courseworks, homeworks, book reviews, book reports, lab reports, projects, presentations and other assignments of top quality. More than 700 professional Ph.D. and Master’s academic writers. Feel free to order a custom written essay on The Necklace from our professional essay writing service.

0.00 avg. rating (0% score) - 0 votes

Back to blog

Sep 15, 2010

Filed under: Example Papers — Tags: character analysis essays, literature essay, The Necklace essay, The Necklace essay example, The Necklace essay sample, The Necklace term paper — Joan Young @ 10:55 am

The story The Necklace by Guy de Maupassant is a biting criticism of vanity. It follows the life and hopes of Madame Loisel who dreams of being bedecked with jewels and fine dresses. Her pride causes her constant discomfort in life. Highlighting the disappointments in Madame Loisel’s life, de Maupassant creates a bitter picture of a life wasted. The story makes full use of irony, in describing her situation in life, her empty fulfillment, and the consequences of vanity.

The story is setup with the statement “for women have no caste or class, their beauty, grace, and charm serving them for birth or family… and put the slum girl on a level with the highest lady of the land.” Madame Loisel dreams that she was born for every delicacy and luxury, but that she had married beneath herself. She dreams of being desired by many men and the center of attention. Madame Loisel’s pride and vanity are very large to her stature. Despite her longings, she finds herself married to a clerk in the Ministry of Education. The implication is that Madame Loisel does not posses the characteristics of a woman of high social standing. The irony here is that if Madame Loisel had possessed these characteristics, it is possible that she could have married up and enjoyed the life of luxury she desired.

When Madame Loisel’s husband receives an invitation to a ball thrown by the ministry, Madame Loisel is thrown into despair because she does not have the proper attire. Her husband gives her his savings for a dress. She then needs the perfect necklace, which she borrows from a wealthy friend. When she returns home from the ball, however, she finds the necklace is no longer around her neck. All the pleasure she had that night, all her dreams fulfilled, ended up being empty and meaningless. Despite the fulfillment of her greatest dreams and the vanities of her pride, this is reduced to nothing as she and her husband must now struggle to find and buy diamonds to replace the lost necklace.

The final irony occurs ten years later, after Madame Loisel and her husband have worked themselves to the bone to repay the debt incurred by the loss. She runs into her friend who lent her the diamond necklace for the party. Her friend refuses to speak with her, thinking she is a common woman, worn and rugged. After telling her who she is, she blames her friend for her terrible appearance and slip into poverty, “… and all on your account.” She tells her friend that she lost the necklace loaned to her that night for the ball and that the past ten years have been spent working to repay the money to replace the necklace. Her friend is astounded, but not nearly as astounded as Madame Loisel is about to be. Her friend replies “Oh, my poor Mathilde! But mine was imitation. It was worth at the very most five hundred francs!” This is the ultimate ironic twist and puts the entire story into perspective.

Guy de Maupassant is taking a critical view of a woman’s pride and vanity. At many places in the story he shows the irony of Madame Loisel’s situation. From the time of her marriage, through her blossoming years, Madame Loisel desires what she does not have and dreams that her life should be other than it is. It is only after ten years of hard labor and abject poverty that she realizes the mistake pride led her to make. At that point, the years cannot be regained.

One thought on “Essays Written On The Necklace

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *